High-pitched whining and the clunking of the paper-feed system imply that the office may find publishing an interruption. One location where inkjets hold a side over lasers is sound pollution, and it is reasonable to say that neither the Samsung nor the Dell is peaceful. Both our printers became warm throughout extended runs, which, combined with a miniature paper course, meant that some web pages were susceptible to furling.

The paper tray does not have a door enclosing it, simply detachable dirt protection, further streamlining issues. The doors concealing the printer toner and fuser units have a reassuringly firm feel. Personalities have crisp sides, and as long as you keep away from complex colour letterheads, the ML-1610 is ideal for letters, records, and memos.īoth units share the same sturdy development quality. Ordinary text quality was perfect, however, and that is indeed what these units are designed for. Both printer drivers have options to darken or publish the text as black, but this didn’t make the text on grey histories more understandable. Samsung ML-1610 Driver – Business videos experienced similar problems, with fine print being challenging to read versus a grey history. This led to some terrible greyscale ramps – the publish engine has a problem with refined colour gradations – and we saw an ugly blend of tipping, banding, and excessively obvious dithering in our challenging picture tests. Images were intelligible but experienced both banding and unsubtle dithering artifacts. It would be unjust to anticipate excellent picture quality from inexpensive printers, but Dell and Samsung returned bad pictures and battled with introductory mono video.

Both printers refined the job in 12 secs. The Samsung accomplished the same outstanding speed in our four-page PDF, although the Dell slowed down slightly to 12ppm. A 24-page DTP document from Word was refined in merely 15 secs and published at 17.3ppm for Samsung, and refined in 14 secs and printed at 14ppm for Dell. The Dell improved to 15ppm, and its processing time lowered to 14 secs.īoth printers have simply 2MB of onboard RAM, although this didn’t affect efficiency in our video test. Points improved further for the ML-1610 with our 12-page Standout document, which pressed the accelerate to 18ppm, while processing times dropped to 11 secs. Samsung’s claims transformed bent on be slightly conservative in our tests, and our 5 per cent mono document published in simply 2 mins, 57 secs after processing the job for 15 secs – a price of 17ppm.ĭell took 32 secs, much longer, to publish the same document, validating Dell’s claims of 14ppm.

Samsung ML-1610 Driver – Samsung is estimated at 16ppm, while Dell claims 14ppm for its unit. Samsung ML-1610 FULL Driver from HP Website. Samsung Print Driver for Linux: download.Samsung Universal Print Driver for Windows: download.

Samsung ml 1610 printer for mac